Gigabyte's GA-8S648FX Motherboard
Bridging the gap with the SiS 648FX

"Burned" in by Robert Maloney
August 13th, 2003

How We Configured Our Test Systems:

To help fully explain the scores we listed in the following benchmarks, we'll explain how the systems were set up before running the benchmarks. Our normal practice is to start off by manually optimizing the BIOS settings to the most aggressive system options available to us. For example, the memory frequency was manually set to DDR400 with the CAS timings set to 2-5-2-2 on the Abit IS7-G.  However, as we have mentioned earlier, we could not change any settings on the GA-8S648FX.  We were left at running the system using default memory timings and the system performance setting left at "default".

Once the BIOS options were set, the hard drive was formatted as a FAT32 partition, and Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 1 was installed. After the Windows installation completed, we installed the latest Intel chipset drivers for the 865PE boards, the SiS AGP drivers on the 648FX, and upgraded to DirectX 9.0a.  We then installed the drivers for the rest of the components, using drivers supplied on each manufacturer's CD, except for the Tyan Tachyon G9500 Pro video card.  For the G9500, we installed the latest (at the time of testing) ATi Catalyst drivers, version 3.4.  Auto-Updating, Hibernation, and System Restore were disabled, and then we set up a 768MB permanent page file. On these test systems we set the visual effects to "best performance" in system performance to limit any effects these settings would have on the benchmarks.   Satisfied that every thing was set up correctly, we installed all of the benchmarking software, defragged the hard drive, and rebooted one last time. 

HotHardware Test Setup
The SiS648FX goes up against the big boys

Motherboards Tested:
Gigabyte GA-8S648FX (SiS 648FX)
Abit IS7-G (Intel 865PE)
Chaintech Apogee 9PJL (Intel 865PE)


Common Hardware:
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 2.40C 2.4GHz / 800MHz System Bus
512MB (256MB x2) GEIL DDR433 SDRAM (2-5-2-2)
Tyan Tachyon G9500 Pro
Western Digital 20GB ATA100 Hard Drive
52x Creative Labs CD-ROM

Software / System Drivers:
Windows XP with Service Pack 1
DirectX 9.0a
ATi Catalyst Drivers, v3.4
Intel Chipset Software, v5.00.1012
SiS AGP Driver, v1.16.01
SiS MiniIDE driver, v2.04
 

SiSoft Sandra Benchmarks
Synthetic testing

SANDRA (the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information and diagnostic utility put out by the folks at SiSoftware.  It's a quick and easy way to compare the CPU, Memory, and Hard drive performance of a given system against an internal database of similar systems and drives. These benchmarks are theoretical scores, and can't necessarily be measured in real-world terms, but provide a good way to make comparisons amongst like components.  All of these tests were run with our CPU set to its default clock speed (~2.40GHz / 12 x 200MHz).


( ALU MEASURED IN MIPS / FPU MEASURED IN MFLOPS )


( MEASURED IN IT/S )


( MEASURED IN MB/S )

In Sandra's CPU benchmark, the GA-8S648FX went pound for pound with the two Springdales, bettering them slightly on one score, and then falling slightly behind in the other.  The multimedia performance scores were also very close, although the Floating Point calculations on the Gigabyte board began to drop off by 600 points.  The real difference came in the memory performance, which was what we expected.  The scores for the GA-8S648FX were good, for a single channel based board  but fell far behind the bandwidth provided by the Dual DDR channels on the other two boards.  With or without "PAT-like enhancements", the Springdales are a force to be reckoned with.

Winstones and PCMark2002 Benchmarks