Asus T10 Full Tower ATX Case w/ 300W
PS(supplied by Outside
Loop Computers),
AMD Duron 650 @ 650MHz. and
Overclocked, QDI
7T Socket A Motherboard,
128MB of Samsung -GH SDRAM @
100MHz/CAS2, 18gig WD Expert 7200 RPM
ATA66 Hard Drive, Leadtek Winfast
GeForce2 GTS w/ NVidia 6.18 Detonator3
Drivers, Asus
48X CDROM, Win98, DirectX 7.0a,
Via 4-in-1 4.24a Drivers (4.03d AGP
driver)
|
These scores aren't too shabby, for
AMD's "scrub" CPU, on a VIA
based motherboard (deja vu...). The
memory benchmarks could have been much
better, if the board had been stable
at the ±33 MHz setting. My Samsung GH
memory has run as high as CAS2 133MHz,
or CAS3 143MHz. But all the 7T could
handle was CAS2 106MHz. The saving
grace, as far as memory performance is
concerned, is the board using Bank 4
Interleave.
ZD
Winbench
Here's
the Winbench99 results. I included a
few other systems, for reference.
3DMark2000
And
now, everyone's favorite benchmark,
that seems to think it's a
vegetable. But it is pretty fun
for bragging rights. Complete default
video card settings (except V-synch,
which was disabled), and I utilized
the latest, and greatest, Detonator 3
drivers.
3DMark2000 results in detail
(650MHz)
Duron @ 650MHz
Duron @ 690MHz
Quake
3 Arena
*Quake3
Arena w/Duron @ 650MHz*
Game
Options:
All
off except dynamic lights, and
high quality sky
Quality
Setting:
High
32bit color |
Resolution |
650MHz |
690MHz |
640x480 |
125.3 |
131.9 |
800x600 |
119.6 |
125.1 |
1024x768 |
94.8 |
97.2 |
Well,
there really isn't much to say about
QIIIA. The Duron 650/GeForce2 combo is
pretty powerful. If you can't live
with 97.2fps in Q3, at 1024x768 32bit
color, then something is definitely
wrong with you, and you should go seek
medical help.
The
verdict is in
This
was a pretty difficult review for me,
for a number of reasons. The main
reason being, that I'm a pretty
positive guy and I don't like to do a
whole lot of complaining. But seeing
how this is the first motherboard I've
ever used that didn't work correctly
(and believe me, I've used more then
my fair share...), it was a little
tough. Now, don't get me wrong, I knew
there was a chance of it not working,
even before I ever plugged it in.
Shoot, go into any BBS and you'll see
untold millions of geeks whining about
how they can't get their board to work
correctly. But up until now, I'd
always chalked it up to some folks
being knuckleheads, and not knowing
what they're doing. I guess I have a
better understanding now, of what
those poor saps were going through.
Anyway, regardless of all the KinetiZ
7T's short comings, It still managed
to to be a stable, and decent
performer. And those were the only
reasons I didn't give it our lowest
rating. The QDI KinetiZ 7T has a less
then perfect layout, has features that
do not work (multiplier changer), a
lackluster BIOS (no voltage
adjustment) and basically didn't run
correctly (IDE port 1). Because of
these "issues", I'm going
give the QDI KinetiZ 7T a Hot Hardware
Rating of.....
Get
the Good
Stuff At Outside Loop Computers
Now !
Discuss
this review and more in the
HotHardware Conference Room!
|