Test
System specs are important to know, so that you
can make a fair assessment on performance and our
benchmark scores. Here are the details of
our test bed.
|
Hot
Hardware's Test System |
The
latest gear |
|
LiteOn
Mid Tower ATX Case w/ 300W PS, Pentium III 1GHz.
FCPGA at 933MHz. and 1Ghz.., Abit
SA6R Motherboard, 128MB of PC133 True CAS2
SDRAM from Corsair (thanks Outside
Loop), Dual IBM 15Gig 7200 RPM ATA100 Hard
Drives (thanks again Outside
Loop), nVidia GeForce 2 GTS Ultra 64MB
AGP Graphics Card , Kenwood
72X CDROM, Win
98SE, DirectX 7.0a, nVidia Detonator 3 Driver
version 6.31
Why
not jump right into the fun stuff here and show
you what the SA6R can do for the over-clocking
crowd.
|
Overclocking
With The SA6R |
Our
1GHz. FCPGA really liked its new
home |
|
Abit's
first attempt at an i815E board was pretty
straight forward and not all that exciting when it
came to over-clocking. Sure, SoftMenu II was
in there but the granularity of Front Side Bus
speed selection was just "so-so" and it
didn't allow us to explore the outer limits of our
CPU. The SA6R is a whole different animal
however and really shined for us.
The
SA6R uses the same brand of PLL (phase lock loop)
based Clock Generator from Realtek
Semiconductor, that the
Abit BX133 RAID uses. The actual PLL
that the SA6R uses is part number RTM5060-25
and is the one that cranks all the way up to
250MHz. Herein lies one of Abit's secrets
for delivering all those really spiffy clock
frequencies to the Front Side Bus. This chip
provides super clean lower jitter (drift from the
the base signal) clock timing in 1MHz.
increments.
We
experienced EXCELLENT stability with the SA6R at
all clock speeds and were able to take the
1GHz. Coppermine CPU we used to new heights
of over-clocking that we haven't hit with any
other board to date. This in and of itself
should be considered a strong endorsement from Hot
Hardware for this motherboard. Here are the
details.
Before
today, we were only able to get the 1GHz. P3 to a
clock speed of 1.088 GHz. The SA6R allowed
us to hit the 1.1G mark with a 147MHz. Front Side
Bus speed. We ran the processor at a rather
high voltage of 1.95V but things were stable for
hours of testing. We didn't really
"shake and bake" things too hard but
regardless we completed our testing without a
crash, so we're claiming success. ;)
In short, the SA6R is designed with the
"Over-Clockers" in mind and delivers on
every level of that criteria.
|
Benchmarks
With The SA6R |
Taking
it up a notch |
|
SiSoft's
Sandra is always our quick sanity check...
CPU
Test @ 933
|
Multimedia
Test @ 933
|
Memory
Test @ 933
|
Drive
Test ATA100 @ 933
|
CPU
Test @ 1.1GHz.
|
Multimedia
Test @ 1.1GHz.
|
Memory
Test @ 1.1GHz. (147 FSB)
|
Drive
Test ATA100 RAID !
|
|
|
Looking
at the clock speed reported by Sandra here, we
would have to say that the SA6R has very
aggressive clock timing for the FSB. When we
set the FSB to 933MHz., Sandra reported 941MHz.
and when set to 147MHz. X 7.5 for a total of
1102MHz., Sandra reports 1114MHz. This
should goose things up in the Application
Benchmarks. So, when set to a specific
"stock retail" clock frequency, the SA6R
still over-clocks your processor ever so
slightly. Since stability was excellent with
this board, we view this a nothing but positive
for the end user.
Memory
scores were decent and when set to 147MHz. FSB,
the i815E chipset has that much more headroom
available in bandwidth. Finally, the drive
scores (taken on the Intel i815E controller) with
an straight forward ATA100 interface, are very
good. With the High Point RAID Mode 0 setup,
they are down right fantastic! The Sandra
scores favor the "bursty" access
and throughput of RAID 0 even more so than an some
Ultra SCSI 160 setups we have tested here
recently. However, "sustained"
bandwidth with Ultra SCSI 160 is still much
higher. On the other hand an Ultra160 setup
will set you back a lot more than the 2 $100
ATA100 drives we used here and you don't need an
additional adapter card with the SA6R since it is
integrated on the motherboard.
That
concludes the synthetic benchmarks. Let's
look at real application performance
numbers.
More
Benchmarks and The Heat Meter Rating ! |