Gainward's AGP8X NVIDIA Powered "Golden Samples"
Giving Things a Boost with AGP 8X

By - Jeff Bouton
December 03, 2002

The Hothardware Test System & Testing Methodology
Pure P4 Power


COMMON HARDWARE:

Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz (2400MHz - 533MHz FSB)

Soyo P4X400 DRAGON Ultra (AGP 8X)

256MB Corsair PC3200 (CAS 2)
On-Board NIC
On-Board Sound
IBM 7200RPM 60GB HD
Lite-On 16X DVD-ROM
Standard Floppy Drive
Windows XP Professional SP1 (DirectX 8.1)
VIA 4-In-1 v4.43
NVIDIA Detonators v40.41 Drivers

VIDEO CARDS TESTED:
Gainward GF4 Ti Ultra 650/XP Golden Sample (128MB)
Gainward GF4 MX Pro 600/8X-XP Golden Sample (64MB)

MSI GF4 Ti 4200 (128MB)
NVIDIA GF4 MX 440 Reference Board (64MB)

Methodology:
Due to the fact that we have seen significant variations in benchmark scores from one site to the next, we feel it is necessary to explain exactly how we configure each test system before running any benchmarks. We chose to test these video boards on the Soyo P4X400 DRAGON Ultra, with a 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (533MHz FSB), because it functioned at AGP8X.  The first thing we did when configuring this system was enter the BIOS and select "Load Optimized Defaults".  We then configured the Memory CAS Latency and other memory timings to be set by the SPD, but ran the memory at 166MHz (PC2700). The hard drive was then formatted, and Windows XP Professional w/ SP1 was installed. After the Windows installation was complete, we installed the VIA 4-In-1 drivers and then hit the Windows Update site and downloaded all of the available updates, with the exception of the ones related to Windows Messenger. Then we installed all of the necessary drivers for the rest of our components, then disabled and removed Windows Messenger.  Auto-Updating and System Restore were also disabled, and then we set up a 768MB permanent page file.  Lastly, we set Windows XPs Visual Effects to "best performance", installed all of the benchmarking software, defragged the hard drive and ran all of the tests at the CPU's default clock speed.
 
   
DirectX 8 Benchmarks with 3DMark 2001SE (Build 330)
MadOnion's Flagship

First well start off our tests with one of our favorite Direct X 8 benchmarking applications, MadOnions 3DMark 2001SE.  We ran each card at both 1024x768 and 1600x1200 resolutions to give a wide range of performance scores.  We threw in an MSI Ti4200 and a nVidia GeForce4 MX440 reference card in for comparison.

When we take into consideration that AGP 3.0 provides twice the bandwidth of AGP 2.0, we would've hoped to see greater increases in performance.  The 650/XP averaged a gain of 1.5-to-2 percent in each test.  The MX Pro posted larger gains over the reference card, but keep in mind it is clocked at 275/500 versus the reference card's 270/400 clockspeeds.
 

More DirectX with NovaLogic's Comanche4
Bullet Time is so cool!

Another popular DirectX benchmarking utility is NovaLogics Comanche4.  Not only is it an effective test, it is one of the best looking too!  Once again we ran the test at 1024x768 and 1600x1200 to cover the spectrum of commonly run resolutions.  Lets take a look.

Novalogics Comanche4 showed greater gains than we saw with 3DMark2001SE.  The 650/XP boosted its output by 4.7-4.9%.  Taking into account its more aggressive clockspeeds, the MX Pro 600 yielded lesser gains than we saw with 3DMark2001SE because Comanche4 is very CPU dependant.
 

On to OpenGL with Quake 3